<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A New Model for ID Cards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cro.alienpants.com/index.php/2006/02/06/a-new-model-for-id-cards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cro.alienpants.com/index.php/2006/02/06/a-new-model-for-id-cards/</link>
	<description>general things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 16:24:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robin Wilton</title>
		<link>http://cro.alienpants.com/index.php/2006/02/06/a-new-model-for-id-cards/comment-page-1/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Wilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 10:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cro.alienpants.com/?p=144#comment-186</guid>
		<description>Tom, I think that&#039;s a good and perceptive analysis. In a way, it reflects some of what I was saying a while ago, that people already have  multiple credentials which could be federated in order to build up an increasingly trustworthy pattern of evidence in support of identity assertions. 

http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/racingsnake?anchor=uk_parliamentary_report_on_id

that said, I think we will find your idea, for all its merits, falls foul of policy/procedural inflexibility... 
I was frustrated for years by the Government Gateway&#039;s refusal to acknowledge, for instance, that my high-trust Thawte certificate was as good a way to identify me as their &#039;approved&#039; issuers&#039; certs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, I think that&#8217;s a good and perceptive analysis. In a way, it reflects some of what I was saying a while ago, that people already have  multiple credentials which could be federated in order to build up an increasingly trustworthy pattern of evidence in support of identity assertions. </p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/racingsnake?anchor=uk_parliamentary_report_on_id" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/racingsnake?anchor=uk_parliamentary_report_on_id</a></p>
<p>that said, I think we will find your idea, for all its merits, falls foul of policy/procedural inflexibility&#8230;<br />
I was frustrated for years by the Government Gateway&#8217;s refusal to acknowledge, for instance, that my high-trust Thawte certificate was as good a way to identify me as their &#8216;approved&#8217; issuers&#8217; certs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
